Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Carl(a)

To whom it may concern:

It is not often that I am compelled to write letters of support for
people and situations that I am not intimately involved with. I am
an artist with a developing media practice that is looking for
opportunities to nurture and focus my work further. Naturally, this
has made me consider applying to graduate schools not just within my
own country but in the United States. Essentially, I am looking for
an open, nurturing yet rigorous and challenging environment to expand
my practice. Syracuse as a community is known for fostering new and
distinct talent and bridging it with artists whose work that is
renowned the world over. Syracuse University is able to attract an
eminent faculty that teach with the same passion that they put into
their own work. This is quite a rare situation, and it seems as if
the surging arts community in Syracuse is at a high point.
Personally, the Transmedia program at SU seems like a perfect fit.
From what I can tell, it is an innovative program with a healthy
balance of international students that are nurtured by a renowned
faculty and buttressed by a wealth of curators, galleries and open
minds.

This perception has been undermined by the overtly autocratic removal
of Astria Suparak. News of her dismissal has traveled fast and far,
and its effect has resonated beyond the immediate Syracuse arts
community. The negative publicity surrounding this action and the
subsequent publication of the emails between Suparak and Jeffery
Hoone are eye opening to say the least. I am not presuming that I
know what it takes to run a space like the Warehouse, nor would i
dare say that I know anything about the political machinations
necessary to support potentially offensive material. I can only
assume that it must be difficult and time consuming to balance the
needs of various special interests in order to support challenging
work within the framework of a large American university. However, I
do know the adverse effect of a bureaucratic infrastructure that is
completely at odds with the artistic community that it claims to
support. To make matters worse, the email chain exposes Mr. Hoone's
critical blind-spots, his lack of interest in young and developing
practices and worst of all a thinly disguised and wholly destructive
ego that refuses to let one of SU's brightest people share her gift
for innovative curation.

This shameless display of ego, the tyrannical nature of this disposal
of a great asset and the insular protection of Mr. Hoone by the
undemocratic structure of the CMAC have made me seriously reconsider
if it is worth submitting any application to your school.

respectfully yours,

Carl(a)

Vancouver, Canada

No comments:

Post a Comment